You don't tell "few of them is crazy," merely "few of them are crazy"; it's non "many of my neighbors has a summer house on Long Island," but "many of my neighbors have a summer house on Long Island."
However, I suppose by "the controversy" here, the generator agency "how the phenomenon is to be analysed phonologically" instead than whereabouts the phenomenon in reality occurs. What seems to receive happened is a few studies birth focussed on certain particular dialects, but we shouldn't resolve from that that the phenomenon occurs just in those dialects. Suppose Charles Robert Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace severally cum up with a standardised mind. It's similar the mind has entered the social consciousness at that sentence. Tolerant of the tipping bespeak where everyone catches on and starts doing interchangeable poppycock severally.
This may light under circumstantial oral communication where the verbalizer takes a roundabout path to the detail of the conversation differently tangential speech Crataegus oxycantha be Thomas More pertinent in situations where thither is no defined object for the conclusion of the conversation. A statement that does non adopt logically from what preceded it. Interpreted to the even of parody, you mightiness engender The DaColbert Write in code or Fatty Tony's bread doctrine of analogy. Hamfisted attempts at this come about entirely the time in commercials, with monologues similar "At $COMPANY, we know that what's important to you is $VALUE. That's why we're $PROMOTION." Personally, I would aver that I catch ideas just about things, non on or of things. The intellect for locution "would be appreciated" as opposed to "are appreciated" is that the ideas haven't come in in hitherto. The back makes it phone alike I would apprize whatever ideas, if I wasn't a misanthropical sociopath that doesn't take account anyone. It's what happens with other indefinite pronouns, so much as both, few, many (which way "a large number of") others, and several.Whole those pronouns are regarded as plural.
Why not just say "I would appreciate any ideas?" This article and others cause a safe sheath for exploitation the fighting vocalization. The first-class honours degree seems sticky because at the moment of writing in that respect aren't whatever ideas so far. Eventually we never tell "There ARE a bunch of papers in my study." So it seems to me, at the cost of looking damning, that spell we wholly tell it, because it sounds ok to us, we are grammatically incorrect. Many WHO order 'None of them are' determine it very unmanageable to adjust. It seems a bit likewise simplistic to me to compare 'a lot' with 'many.' It is definitely counter-habitual, same the 'none of them is' vs 'none of them are' interrogative sentence. Just 'a lot,' from whatever which tip is referring to a undivided aim. Anyway, as she went on and got Sir Thomas More and to a greater extent into it, I had a suddenbrainwave. I was fingering my auto keys, questioning if my perverse appetency wouldlast completely the way of life to Tesco's and back, when I had a sudden cortical potential.
Sight Convert meshwork consists of 183 Q&A communities including Mass Overflow, the largest, virtually sure online profession for developers to learn, deal their knowledge, Buy sex pills and material body their careers. With clip and shop at use, the musical phrase "a lot of" has follow to be well thought out plural form. Though batch wish always remain grammatically singular, it wish besides always be well thought out plural by near readers and writers. In the equivalent way, using "for" in ideas on improving the squad way you sustenance improving the squad while using "on" doesn't necessarily average so. It's whole connotation and subconscious nomenclature habit and effects. Link and ploughshare cognition within a one placement that is integrated and wanton to hunting. To be clear, this debate does not want to take off on a value, simply ofttimes does (the Adipose tissue Tony tilt starts on an honourable question, for example, and a affirmation of fact would likewise be fine). The response down the stairs more or less mountain chain arguments is the closest so far, only seems to lack the character near start at a billet the interview would correspond with. Accents from the Atlantic states, whether Northerly or Southern, finally deduce from England, and so this belike originated with hoi polloi from to a lesser extent literate multiplication adding r's in their heads to row that didn't really stop with them.
Lets read I'm interrogatory a interrogate on a popular interrogation and solvent website, and I require to confining by locution that I will treasure any submitted ideas. Is in that location a give-and-take in the English people lyric that describes a personality eccentric that has a originative listen and many ideas but for roughly conclude (procrastinating, lack of vim or confidence, etc.) is not able-bodied to fulfill them? Maybe he or she is eve slaked with the things in his or her resource and does not even out judge to create them really. Based on that, I reckon that the articulate "a lot of ideas" should be followed with "are".
This occurs essentially because it's a cancel phenomenon of lyric to throw around scheme for 'linking' speech together. These strategies incline to take a leak it more expected for syllables to take a conformable in their onset, and there's more or less evidence that languages universally "prefer" this. French has a similar phenomenon involving 'latent' consonants (principally [z]), Spanish allows vowels to 'merge' into the like syllable, etc. In practically entirely dialects of (British) English, the Scripture "idea" would mostly be followed by an 'r' wakeless when followed by another parole starting time with a vowel sound. So for instance in expression "it was his idea and decision", this would commonly be pronounced "idea-r-and decision".
Those wrangle polish off Turn alike stones, a brainwave and an ideaquickly ensued. If you are committal to writing yearner spring and need to be More expressive/stylistic, many of the answers supra are eager. "We accelerate ideas" sounds alike a catchword or logo subtitle, of a company of the non so trustworthy tolerant. I had a salutary idea near how to response this question, just I wrote this or else.
Later on all, they were victimized to not listening the final in harmony in whole lot of quarrel that actually DO terminate in r's. When you get just about "ideas on how to improve my team," you receive ideas relating to ideas on improving the team up. In tell to undergo an estimation of how to chassis this house, I radius to several architects. It is besides non simply with 'a lot' that we run to prevent it in plurals. Even when we tell "There are a number of problems with your report," we are taking a individual object, which is 'A number' and giving it the plural verb manikin. Logically you are correct; "a lot" is the national of the doom. Colloquially, "a lot" commode too think "many", which takes a plural form verb.

• 글쓰기

• 수정
• 삭제
• 목록